On-demand development workflow skills for DSH, covering requirements, planning, debugging, testing, code review and verification before finishing.
Marketplace version 2.14.2-build-2 is based on upstream 2.14.2. Installation and operation on DSH 0.2.1-rc.3 have not been verified.
Aegis
Stop babysitting your agent. Aegis makes your agent plan against your real
baseline before it edits, prove completion with fresh evidence, and leave simple
tasks alone — you get fewer reworks, safer changes, and less blind trust in "done".
What You Get
Aegis is a method pack that makes AI coding agents work like disciplined
engineers — so you don't have to watch them.
- Fewer reworks. Your agent aligns with your project's real baseline —
owners, contracts, boundaries — before touching code. It stops guessing, and
so do you.
- Safer changes. Measured on a frozen held-out A/B benchmark: contract
pass rate 61.67% → 93.33%, unsafe outcomes 13.33% → 0%.
- Proof before "done". Completion claims ship with fresh verification
evidence, covered scope, and residual risk. You read evidence, not vibes.
- No ghost code. Retired fallbacks and old paths are tracked or removed
with a retirement trigger — technical debt stops accumulating silently.
- Simple tasks stay simple. Trivial requests stay on the fast path;
ceremony only appears when the task genuinely needs it.
- UI/UX rules on demand. [UI/UX governance]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/skills/ui-ux-governance/SKILL.md)
carries project design rules, lower user effort, and scoped experience evidence
through design, implementation, review, and verification.
- One method pack, every host. The same discipline works across Codex,
Claude Code, OpenCode, Kimi, and other skill-aware hosts.
These numbers are bounded advisory evidence from Aegis 2.7.6 (2026-08-11),
not a measurement of this release, a universal-quality claim, or completion authority.
See the full benchmark and its limitations.
Quick Install
Install and enable Aegis from the NanoAI marketplace, reload DSH when prompted, and describe your task in a new session. Enable only one copy of the Aegis skills.
Measured Agentic Benchmark
A frozen held-out A/B benchmark for Aegis 2.7.6 (2026-08-11) kept the Codex client, prompts, projects, tool policy, and requested the same gpt-5.6-sol / xhigh setting in both arms; only the Aegis projection differed. Across 120 valid runs on 20 cases,
contract pass rate was 61.67% → 93.33% (+31.67 pp) and unsafe outcomes were 13.33% → 0%. The 95% case-cluster interval was +15.00 pp to +50.00 pp. This is bounded advisory evidence; review was arm-hidden technical review, not independent human review, and host events did not return the observed model identity.

[Sanitized JSON]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/benchmarks/results/gpt-5-6-sol-xhigh-extended-20260811-v2-7-6.json) · [English table]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/benchmarks/results/gpt-5-6-sol-xhigh-extended-20260811-v2-7-6.en.md) · [中文表格]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/benchmarks/results/gpt-5-6-sol-xhigh-extended-20260811-v2-7-6.zh-CN.md) · [Methodology]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/current/AEGIS_AGENTIC_BENCHMARK_BASELINE.md)
A newer [matrix-v7 standard snapshot for Aegis 2.10.8]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/benchmarks/results/gpt-5-6-sol-xhigh-standard-20260925-v2-10-8.en.md)
covers 22 cases with one observation per arm and case. It uses a different run
profile from the extended snapshot above and does not measure the changes in
this release.
Try Aegis Methods in a Coding Runtime
Autoloom is our AI coding desktop
client. It brings Aegis's change necessity analysis, complexity governance, and
delivery review into development execution, helping you spend less time
repeating instructions and inspect the evidence behind delivered changes.
Currently available as a Windows x64 Alpha. The client is free; choose your
model provider, which bills model usage separately.
Explore Autoloom ·
Download Alpha
Updating Aegis
After a complete install has registered the current host, later updates can use
natural language such as update Aegis or the explicit skill request
aegis:update. The agent can route either form through the local update path:
locate the installed method-pack root, use the host-scoped registry, and call
scripts/aegis-update.py for the current host by default. Updating every
registered host requires an explicit --all request. Aegis does not run
background automatic updates by default.
Before You Use It
Aegis is currently:
Aegis Method Pack (runtime-ready)
It is not the full Aegis Platform, a daemon, a background runner, a runtime
core, an authoritative GateDecision, an authoritative PolicySnapshot, or
final completion authority. User instructions and target-project rules outrank
Aegis guidance.
The [global routing prefix]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/GLOBAL_USER_RULES_TEMPLATE.md) is an optional,
manually copied host/profile projection. It does not install Aegis or prove
skill discovery. If the host already has reliable Aegis bootstrap and routing,
no extra global rule is usually needed. Otherwise, add the prefix at the very
beginning of the existing global user rules without changing unrelated
content.
This copied prefix is not managed by aegis:update. Users who previously
copied the retired Lite / Advanced profiles should replace only those old
Aegis blocks with the unified prefix. The prefix follows the host or session
activation mode, defaults to auto when none is declared, and leaves detailed
workflow governance to the loaded Aegis skills. Host-native skill matching may
still remain host-controlled.
Activation mode defaults to automatic. To switch to explicit mode, run this
from the installed method-pack root:
cd <aegis-method-pack-root>
python scripts/aegis-doctor.py activation-mode explicit
Restart the host after changing activation mode. Details and host caveats live
in [docs/current/AEGIS_ACTIVATION_MODE.md]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/current/AEGIS_ACTIVATION_MODE.md).
TDD mode defaults to off: Aegis does not automatically require TDD, and
completion verification still applies. To enable automatic TDD routing when you
want Aegis to choose strict, light, or skipped by task risk:
cd <aegis-method-pack-root>
python scripts/aegis-doctor.py tdd-mode auto
You can also request strict TDD directly in a query with explicit markers such
as TDD Route: strict, strict TDD, test-first, or
RED / GREEN / REFACTOR.
Details live in [docs/current/AEGIS_TDD_MODE.md][i18n1].
Supported Hosts
Aegis keeps a multi-host, plugin-installable distribution goal.
| Host group |
Current status |
Start here |
Codex, OpenCode |
Fresh evidence exists for the current method-pack scope |
[Codex]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.codex.md), [OpenCode]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.opencode.md) |
Claude Code, CodeBuddy, DeepSeek-TUI, DeepSeek Harness, Trae, GitHub Copilot, Qoder, Kimi Code CLI, ZCode, Grok Build |
Install guides exist; release-level fresh host smoke is still pending |
[Claude Code]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.claude-code.md), [CodeBuddy]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.codebuddy.md), [DeepSeek-TUI]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.deepseek-tui.md), [DeepSeek Harness]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.deepseek-harness.md), [Trae]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.trae.md), [GitHub Copilot]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.copilot.md), [Qoder]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.qoder.md), [Kimi Code CLI]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.kimi-code.md), [ZCode]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.zcode.md), [Grok Build]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.grok-build.md) |
CC GUI (JetBrains IDEA) |
Structural IDE plugin layer support for Claude Code / OpenAI-GPT provider paths; release-level fresh host smoke is still pending |
[CC GUI]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.cc-gui.md) |
Antigravity CLI, Antigravity IDE, Antigravity App |
Antigravity CLI has installation and structural discovery evidence; live Aegis skill loading, task routing, and session refresh remain pending verification; IDE/App remain structural targets |
[Antigravity]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.antigravity.md) |
Pi CLI, OMP, OpenClaw, Hermes Agent |
Structural Agent Skills / SKILL.md skill-host adaptations; release-level fresh host smoke is still pending |
[Pi CLI]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.pi.md), [OMP]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.omp.md), [OpenClaw]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.openclaw.md), [Hermes Agent]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/README.hermes-agent.md) |
Gemini CLI |
Retired; Aegis no longer ships or verifies a Gemini CLI adapter |
[Compatibility Matrix][i18n2] |
Read the current host verdict before making support claims:
- [Host compatibility matrix][i18n2]
- [Known limitations]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/current/AEGIS_KNOWN_LIMITATIONS.md)
Start Fast With Aegis
After installation and host restart, use normal language. Aegis matches the
method to the work; name a mode directly when you want less ambiguity.
Why does this login failure happen? Diagnose it before changing code.
Grill me on whether we should ship a hosted version first.
Aegis goal: Fix the auth refresh bug without rewriting the auth system.
Review this diff independently before I merge it.
Read the [Fast-Track Playbook]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/current/AEGIS_FAST_TRACK_PLAYBOOK.md) for
Aegis's lightweight operating model, how it differs from standalone skill
packs, its five engineering moats, project workspace lifecycle, natural trigger
phrases, controls, and troubleshooting. The Chinese version is
[Aegis 速通秘籍]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/current/AEGIS_FAST_TRACK_PLAYBOOK_ZH.md).
Use these explicit requests when you need tighter control:
Aegis goal: ... frames scope, success evidence, and boundaries.
Grill me ... or 审问我 ... starts a decision interview; it asks one
decision question at a time and does not plan or implement.
TDD Route: strict, strict TDD, or test-first explicitly requests
strict test-first work. TDD is otherwise off by default.
aegis:first-principles-review or review this from first principles
pressure-tests a complex direction before implementation.
aegis:update updates the installed method pack through its host-aware path.
For non-trivial project work, Aegis can passively reuse relevant canonical
language from CONTEXT.md or a bounded context selected by CONTEXT-MAP.md.
It activates domain modeling only when a term is resolved, ambiguous, renamed,
deprecated, or conflicting. High-confidence existing facts may synchronize
directly; unresolved domain decisions remain user-owned. Files are created
lazily on the first resolved term and remain glossary-only. Stable bytes can be
cache-friendly, but Aegis does not guarantee provider cache hits or savings.
Aegis preserves Workflow Quality by keeping simple work light and expanding
only when risk warrants it. For deeper method detail, read the
[Workflow Guide][i18n3],
[Workflow Quality Baseline]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/current/AEGIS_WORKFLOW_QUALITY_BASELINE.md),
[Complexity Governance Baseline]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/current/AEGIS_COMPLEXITY_GOVERNANCE_BASELINE.md),
and [TDD mode][i18n1].
If a capability does not trigger as expected, use trigger-chain diagnosis:
install/version visibility, host skill discovery, activation mode,
using-aegis routing, task-to-skill matching, and context pressure. Read the
[Trigger Health Baseline]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/current/AEGIS_TRIGGER_HEALTH_BASELINE.md).
Community & Extending
- Feedback and discussion: [GitHub Discussions]([repository withheld]/discussions) · [Issues]([repository withheld]/issues) · LINUX DO · DEV.to
- Extend Aegis: write your own skill with
aegis:writing-skills; see the [Workflow Guide][i18n3].
- Follow along: [RELEASE-NOTES.md]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/RELEASE-NOTES.md) · [Releases]([repository withheld]/releases)
Aegis and Autoloom
- Aegis is our open-source method pack for bringing engineering discipline
to your existing AI coding host. It remains independently usable with
multi-host support; Autoloom is not required.
- Autoloom is our independent
desktop product for experiencing Aegis's core methods in the coding runtime.
Its client source code is not currently public. Its repository maintains
downloads, release scope, and feedback.
Autoloom carries the runtime-core direction while Aegis retains its method-pack
boundary. The benchmarks on this page measure Aegis, not Autoloom. See the
[product relationship]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/current/AEGIS_PRODUCT_BASELINE.md#current-product-relationship-autoloom)
for the boundary, or bring a scoped task to Autoloom and
share your experience.
Relationship To Superpowers
Aegis is derived from Superpowers,
created by Jesse Vincent. Superpowers pioneered
composable, multi-harness agent skills. Aegis keeps that foundation and adds an
architecture- and evidence-focused method layer for real software projects.
Additional inspiration comes from
mattpocock/skills, especially concise
communication, shared language, and disciplined debugging patterns. These ideas
were re-implemented in Aegis format rather than copied verbatim.
License
MIT License. See [LICENSE]([repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/LICENSE).
[i18n1]: [repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/current/AEGIS_TDD_MODE.md
[i18n2]: [repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/current/AEGIS_HOST_COMPATIBILITY_MATRIX_SNAPSHOT.md
[i18n3]: [repository withheld]/blob/28dfb41e4d08239c6b47c6425396c81cdd10601e/docs/current/AEGIS_WORKFLOW_GUIDE.md